Merck Frosst
 
Favor of Merck

Our main pages on this subject:

1.Merck Frosst Canada - VIOXX® Information Center
 Merck & CoThe Texas Fourth Court of Appeals reversed the jury's verdict and rendered a judgment in favor of Merck.. The jury's original verdict on April 21, 2006 included $ 7 million in compensatory damages and $ 25 million in punitive damages for a total of $ 32 million against Merck.. In today's unanimous opinion, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion wrote, " Even viewing all the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, we conclude the evidence is legally insufficient to support a finding that plaintiffs negated, with reasonable certainty, Mr. Garza's preexisting heart condition as a plausible cause of his death....
 
2.Merck Frosst Canada - VIOXX® Information Center
 MONTRÉAL, December 15, 2006 - Merck & Co, Inc today said it is pleased that a state court jury in Birmingham, Alabama, found in favor of Merck & Co, rejecting a claim that VIOXX caused the 2001 heart attack of an Alabama man. " The jury's decision confirms that Merck & Co acted responsibly and that VIOXX was not the cause of Mr. Albright's heart attack, " said Mike Brock of the Alabama firm of Rushton, Stakely, Johnston & Garrett, Merck & Co's lead attorney in the case....
 
3.Merck Frosst Canada - VIOXX® Information Center
 MONTRÉAL, December 13, 2006 - Merck & Co, Inc today said it is pleased that a federal court jury in New Orleans found in favor of Merck & Co, rejecting a claim that VIOXX caused the 2003 heart attack of a then 47 - year-old Tennessee man....
 
4.Merck Frosst Canada - VIOXX® Information Center
 Montreal, Nov 15, 2006 - Merck & Co, Inc today said it is pleased that a federal court jury in New Orleans found in favor of Merck, rejecting a claim that VIOXX caused the 2003 heart attack of a then 61 - year-old Utah man....
 

Powered by Synomia